---
esco_uri: http://data.europa.eu/esco/skill/56ab5131-93a0-4ce3-b840-6413e687c307
esco_label: "present legal arguments"
relation: essential
onet_soc: 23-1011.00
source: model-knowledge
confidence: high
qa_count: 0
generator: gemma3:27b (prompt-designed and spot-checked by Claude)
generated: 2026-07-10
---

# present legal arguments — Legal Counsel

As Legal Counsel, 'presenting legal arguments' isn’t *just* courtroom advocacy – though that happens. Day-to-day it manifests as concisely briefing senior lawyers on case viability via memo or oral summaries, drafting persuasive clauses for contracts anticipating potential disputes, and responding to regulatory inquiries with legally sound justifications. You'll frequently be building 'mini-arguments' within emails explaining why a proposed action *is* or *isn’t* compliant, or outlining risk exposure. Tools include legal research databases (Westlaw, LexisNexis), precedent documents, and strong writing/editing software. 

A key task is translating complex law into understandable terms for non-legal stakeholders – business units, management, even the client directly. This means anticipating their questions *before* they ask, framing arguments in terms of business impact (cost, reputation, etc.), and avoiding legal jargon where possible. Pitfalls include 'lawyering by citation' (overwhelming with cases without clear application), failing to acknowledge weaknesses in your position, or being overly aggressive which can damage relationships.

Post-trial/negotiation, this competence extends to advising on appeals or enforcement strategies. You might draft demand letters outlining legal grounds for payment, or prepare responses to opposing counsel’s arguments. A strong Legal Counsel doesn't just *state* the law; they proactively *apply* it to the specific facts, demonstrating how the outcome will likely unfold based on different interpretations. This requires a deep understanding of procedural rules and evidentiary standards.

Good looks like: clear, concise communication (written & verbal); arguments logically structured with supporting authority; proactive risk assessment woven into advice; ability to tailor presentation to audience; and consistently achieving favorable outcomes – or clearly explaining why a less-than-ideal outcome is unavoidable given the legal landscape.

## Weitere Anreicherung

Stage-2 source for future practitioner grounding: CORE / DOAB (open-access law monographs).
