# Practitioner knowledge — Recruiter

> **Source & license:** Curated from the Stack Exchange data dump
> `stackexchange_20260331` (community mirror on archive.org). Original questions and
> answers are © their authors, licensed **CC-BY-SA 4.0**; per-entry
> attribution below links each original post and names its author. Summaries
> are SkillFactor's own wording; this compilation is share-alike
> (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Compiled 2026-07-11.


150 curated Q&A insights, grouped by theme, highest community score first.


## Interviewing

**An interviewee had their return flight cancelled by an employer after a poor interview performance, leaving them stranded and financially unable to secure alternative transportation home.**

While legal options may exist depending on location, this situation highlights the importance of evaluating a company's ethical standards beyond just job fit. Though rare, unprofessional behavior like this *can* occur, making it worthwhile to document interactions and consider public feedback (after attempting direct resolution). This experience underscores that how a company treats candidates—even unsuccessful ones—reveals crucial information about its culture.

*Source: [Potential employer flew me out for interview, cancels return flight](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/126565) — answer by Philip Kendall, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker’s friend realized during a lengthy interview that the company culture wasn’t a good fit and decided to leave mid-interview, causing a negative reaction from the interviewers.**

Interviews are a two-way assessment; it's equally disrespectful to continue an interview when you know it won't be a match as it is to abruptly end it. While initial impressions matter, it’s important to give the process enough time to form a considered opinion before making a decision. Prolonging the interaction after recognizing incompatibility wastes everyone’s time and signals a lack of respect for their efforts.

*Source: [Is it rude to leave an interview early if you have already made your decision?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/3492) — answer by Karl Bielefeldt, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The interviewer is concerned that a candidate's long tenure (15+ years) in the same role signals stagnation or lack of ambition, creating bias before even meeting them.**

Preconceived notions about career progression can be misleading; people have diverse motivations and priorities. Staying in a role for an extended period doesn’t automatically indicate inadequacy – it could reflect contentment, suitability to their skills/interests, or personal circumstances prioritizing stability. Focus on evaluating the candidate's current abilities and fit rather than judging their career trajectory based on traditional expectations.

*Source: [Why is working on the same position for more than 15 years not a red flag?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/130330) — answer by DigitalBlade969, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner submitted a pull request to a company's open-source project while interviewing, hoping to demonstrate initiative, but received negative feedback and didn’t get the job. They are questioning if this action was truly inappropriate.**

While not inherently wrong, proactively contributing code during an interview process requires careful consideration of company culture and perceived power dynamics. Demonstrating genuine interest and technical skill *can* be a positive signal, but it's crucial to present contributions humbly and ensure high quality work. Prioritize tact and avoid appearing presumptuous or critical of existing solutions; focus on showcasing collaborative spirit rather than asserting superiority.

*Source: [Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewe](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/130931) — answer by unknown, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner experienced a highly unusual job interview filled with irrelevant and bizarre questions, then received a job offer with significantly higher pay despite the strange process, leaving them unsure whether to accept.**

Unconventional interview tactics, like abstract 'puzzle' questions, are surprisingly common in tech but often lack real value in assessing candidate skills. Companies frequently fail to provide proper interviewer training, leading to poorly structured interviews that prioritize quirky approaches over effective evaluation. Don’t let a flawed interview process entirely disqualify an otherwise attractive opportunity; consider it as one piece of information alongside other factors.

*Source: [What to make of bizarre off-topic questions during job interview](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/120059) — answer by Joe Strazzere, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner, a technical team lead, frequently finds themselves interviewing candidates they already know will not be hired due to various reasons like mismatched skills or changes in company needs, and is seeking advice on *how* to conduct these interviews despite knowing the outcome.**

The core of the response emphasizes that conducting interviews with pre-determined rejection is fundamentally disrespectful and unprofessional. The answer argues that a well-run organization avoids wasting candidate time by proactively communicating issues preventing hiring before scheduling an interview. Prioritizing transparency and respect for candidates' time should be the focus, rather than optimizing a flawed process.

*Source: [As an interviewer, how to conduct interviews with candidates you already know wi](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/145541) — answer by gnasher729, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker is participating in interviews where a single pre-defined 'wrong' answer automatically disqualifies candidates, even if they are otherwise strong. They feel it’s unfair to waste candidates’ time who have made effort to attend and wonder if informing them of this immediately is unprofessional.**

While delivering bad news during an interview isn't ideal, honesty and respect for the candidate's time can be professional if handled tactfully. Critical pre-screening questions should ideally happen *before* scheduling interviews to avoid wasting everyone’s time. Prioritize being upfront about non-negotiable requirements while avoiding potentially illegal or discriminatory questioning.

*Source: [Candidate's answer during an interview disqualifies them. Is it unprofessional t](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/121411) — answer by A.K., CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner observes that interviewers frequently expect software developers to have personal projects, despite the developer preferring to pursue other hobbies in their free time and wonders why this is becoming standard practice.**

Interviewers often use personal projects as a proxy for assessing passion, initiative, and problem-solving skills beyond what's demonstrated at work. While some employers may seek dedication bordering on overwork, ideally they’re looking for evidence of genuine enthusiasm and a well-rounded skillset. It's important to recognize that a healthy work-life balance is valuable, and candidates should be wary of companies prioritizing output above employee wellbeing.

*Source: [Why is it 'expected' that software developers work on their own projects in thei](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/123508) — answer by RibaldEddie, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner submitted a pull request to a company's open-source project while interviewing, hoping to demonstrate initiative, but received negative feedback and didn’t get the job. They are questioning if this action was truly inappropriate.**

While not inherently wrong, proactively contributing code during an interview process requires careful consideration of company culture and perceived power dynamics. Demonstrating genuine interest and technical skill *can* be a positive signal, but it's crucial to present contributions humbly and ensure high quality work. Prioritize tact and avoid appearing presumptuous or critical of existing solutions; focus on showcasing collaborative spirit rather than asserting superiority.

*Source: [Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewe](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/130931) — answer by Zach Lipton, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A company interviewed a candidate who consistently avoided interacting with any of the women on staff, creating discomfort and concern about potential client relationships. They ultimately rejected him due to lack of experience but were unsure how to address this behavior if he *had* been qualified.**

Interview evaluation extends beyond technical skills; assessing 'fit' includes behavioral traits that impact team dynamics and external interactions. A candidate’s demonstrated inability or unwillingness to collaborate effectively with a significant portion of your workforce, or potentially your clients, is a valid reason for rejection. Prioritize confidence in the candidate’s overall suitability – if doubts exist about their ability to function within the company culture, do not hire them.

*Source: [How do we evaluate a candidate who would not speak to any women during the inter](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/85255) — answer by Masked Man, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The interviewee was abruptly dismissed during a job fair interview after the manager declared college education worthless, prioritizing practical experience instead.**

Some individuals hold strong, unconventional beliefs that are unlikely to be changed in an interview setting; attempting to debate or justify your educational path with such a person is unproductive. Recognizing when someone isn't genuinely open to considering you as a candidate is crucial for conserving your energy and focusing on opportunities where you *will* be valued. It’s better to accept the situation and move forward rather than trying to salvage an unwinnable interaction.

*Source: [How to respond to "You should have skipped college" in an interview?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/106762) — answer by Erik, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The candidate proactively performed a security scan of the company’s open WiFi network while waiting for an interview and informed them of the vulnerability. They are now concerned about whether this action negatively impacted their chances of getting hired.**

While demonstrating initiative, unauthorized security testing – even if discovered accidentally – is generally viewed as inappropriate by HR due to potential legal and operational risks. A professional should avoid actively probing a network without explicit permission, as it can be perceived as hostile or disruptive. Instead of directly presenting findings, focus on framing your skills through thoughtful questions about their security practices *during* the interview itself.

*Source: [Is it acceptable to do a security test on a company's open WiFi before an interv](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/112571) — answer by Sascha, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The HR person is experiencing high candidate drop-off after assigning a lengthy (0.5-1 hour) programming task as part of the initial screening process, particularly with recent graduates. They are questioning whether to remove it despite believing it validates skills.**

Lengthy take-home tests are counterproductive and signal poor judgment from an employer; focus on quick assessments (5-10 minutes) to verify basic competency rather than attempting a comprehensive evaluation. A drawn-out hiring process also discourages candidates who receive offers elsewhere, so streamlining the timeline is crucial for securing talent. Prioritize assessing attitude and willingness to engage over perfect coding skills, as those qualities are more indicative of long-term success and manageability.

*Source: [A programming task is scaring off candidates, should we ditch it?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/61478) — answer by Shane, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker declined a second interview after a negative impression from the potential team leader, but now that leader is requesting a meeting to understand why, creating an awkward situation.**

Vague explanations like 'not a good fit' often prompt further inquiry. It’s perfectly acceptable – and professional – to politely state a lack of perceived working compatibility without being overly critical or accusatory. Focusing on differing work styles or a lack of professional connection frames the decision as a matter of team dynamics, not personal dislike.

*Source: [Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/130368) — answer by Old_Lamplighter, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner received a conditional job offer requiring them to pay for an ISO 9001 accreditation upfront as a condition of employment, raising concerns about potential fraud.**

Legitimate quality certifications like ISO 9001 apply to organizations, not individual employees. This request is a red flag indicative of an 'advanced-fee' scam where initial payments are demanded with promises of future reimbursement that never materialize; treat it with the same skepticism you would any other overseas fraud attempt.

*Source: [New employer wants me to pay for ISO 9001 accreditation before employment begins](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/66792) — answer by The Wandering Dev Manager, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker is facing technical interview tests that demand a disproportionate amount of work for the allotted time, and wants advice on whether to complete them even if it means sacrificing quality, as well as how to handle unhelpful feedback or avoid such situations in the future.**

Experienced professionals should prioritize their time and recognize their value in a competitive job market. It's acceptable – and often advisable – to decline tasks that are unrealistic or indicative of poor company practices; framing this as a 'no work without pay' stance is reasonable. Prioritize upfront interviews to assess project suitability *before* committing to technical tests, ensuring the work aligns with your interests and expertise.

*Source: [How to handle interview technical tests that are absurd (e.g. an unreasonably la](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/116752) — answer by TomTom, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is being pressured by a prospective employer in the EU to reveal their current salary and provide a pay slip, fearing this is a tactic to offer a lower salary than deserved.**

Protecting your compensation information is crucial during job negotiations. Instead of disclosing past earnings, confidently state your *required* total compensation for a new role – this immediately filters out employers focused solely on cost-cutting. Proactively shifting the conversation by asking about their budget for the position can also reveal whether they are genuinely valuing your skills or seeking to underpay.

*Source: [Prospective employer asking for my current pay slip during interview](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/149122) — answer by a25bedc5-3d09-41b8-82fb-ea6c353d75ae, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**An HR interviewer was surprised when a candidate brought her mother to the interview and waited in reception, leading the interviewer to question the candidate's independence and consider not hiring her. The interviewer wants advice on how to address this situation with the candidate.**

It’s crucial to avoid making immediate negative assumptions about a candidate’s behavior; instead, directly but politely inquire about the reason for the parent’s presence. Acknowledging the parent demonstrates basic courtesy and allows you to gather information that might reveal a harmless explanation. Ultimately, assess the candidate's overall maturity and self-sufficiency through targeted interview questions rather than solely focusing on this single incident.

*Source: [Candidate brought parent to interview](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/86142) — answer by AndreiROM, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is concerned about interviewing candidates significantly more qualified than required for an entry-level role, fearing they may quickly leave or become disengaged due to the mismatch between their skills and the position.**

Don't automatically disqualify overqualified applicants; instead, prioritize understanding *their motivations* for applying. Directly ask why they are interested in this specific role, as their answer will reveal whether they seek reduced responsibility, a company 'tryout', or are simply accepting any available work. A candidate genuinely desiring the type of work offered could be an excellent hire, but uncovering their true intentions is crucial to avoid costly turnover.

*Source: [How can we handle overqualified applicants for an entry level position?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/95784) — answer by thursdaysgeek, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker received a job offer after only a one-hour panel interview with minimal technical assessment and is unsure if this rapid timeline and lack of in-depth evaluation are warning signs.**

Traditional, lengthy coding interviews aren't always the best indicators of real-world performance; companies are increasingly recognizing that practical experience and communication skills revealed during conversation can be more valuable. A swift interview process isn’t necessarily a red flag – it could indicate efficiency and a desire to secure strong candidates quickly. Prioritize evaluating whether the team seems competent, as being the sole technical expert in an organization is often unsustainable.

*Source: [Interview was just a one hour panel. Got an offer the next day; do I accept or i](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/138330) — answer by berry120, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker had a very poor internal job interview a year ago and is now working directly with that interviewer, fearing the awkwardness of past performance being remembered.**

It’s often best to let potentially embarrassing past interactions lie unless explicitly brought up by the other party. People in interviewing roles process many candidates and quickly move on; what felt significant to you may not have registered strongly with them. Avoid proactively reminding someone of a negative experience, as it risks highlighting something they've likely already forgotten or downplayed.

*Source: [How to acknowledge an embarrassing job interview, now that I work directly with ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/130601) — answer by Karl Brown, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner noticed companies using a 'salary formula' during negotiations and wonders if it’s genuine or a tactic to discourage counteroffers, feeling pressured to accept an offer that aligns with perceived peer salaries.**

While companies may use data and internal leveling systems to guide salary offers, the stated ‘formula’ is often less rigid than presented. Successful negotiation hinges on knowing your own value – what you need and are willing to accept – rather than getting caught up in how the company arrived at its initial offer. Focus on stating your desired compensation and being prepared to walk away if it isn't met; ultimately, the formula is irrelevant if the final number doesn’t work for you.

*Source: [The mysterious salary formula](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/90229) — answer by Joe Strazzere, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker is considering whether to inform a hiring director about their negative experience working with a former manager who is now interviewing for a position at their current company, fearing potential repercussions or appearing unprofessional.**

Providing constructive, objective feedback based on professional experience is a responsible action when it could prevent future organizational harm. While personal grievances should be avoided, sharing relevant observations about a candidate's leadership shortcomings – particularly patterns of team instability – can be valuable to the hiring process. Prioritizing transparency and focusing on potential impacts to projects and teams demonstrates commitment to the company’s success.

*Source: [Should I share my opinion of my former manager (from a different company) who's ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/103733) — answer by PoloHoleSet, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker received unexpected interest from their dream company before feeling adequately skilled for the role and is worried about being 'exposed' during an interview or assessment.**

Instead of self-sabotage or misrepresentation, confidently engage with the opportunity and be honest about your current skill level while expressing enthusiasm for learning. Companies often value potential and cultural fit alongside existing expertise, and taking a chance can build valuable connections even if immediate employment isn't possible. Don’t let fear of inadequacy prevent you from pursuing opportunities; visibility and networking are crucial for long-term career success.

*Source: [What should I do when my dream company is interested in me before my skills are ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/19668) — answer by Nobody, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The user declined a job offer due to cultural concerns and is now being threatened by the hiring manager with a call to their current employer to reveal they were interviewing.**

Don't be intimidated by this unprofessional threat; it’s likely an empty one meant to pressure the candidate. While the situation is frustrating, focusing on the behavior as petty rather than letting it cause anxiety is key. If the hiring manager *does* follow through, simply explain to your current employer that you were contacted but are committed to your existing role.

*Source: [Company threatening to call my current job after I declined their offer](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/139093) — answer by Keith, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The user had a last-minute interview cancellation and is now facing difficulty rescheduling due to prior PTO taken from their current job, creating a potential conflict with their employer.**

Unexpected changes happen in the hiring process, so it's important to address the situation directly and professionally. Communicate your continued interest while clearly stating your scheduling limitations; offering an alternative solution like meeting after hours demonstrates flexibility and commitment without requiring further time off from your current role. A reasonable employer will appreciate this proactive approach and willingness to find a compromise.

*Source: [My interview has been cancelled at short notice, I cannot reschedule, what to do](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/123068) — answer by motosubatsu, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is concerned about accepting a job without understanding the quality of the codebase or company culture, and asks if requesting code samples or employee contacts for informal references is reasonable. They've found these requests are consistently denied.**

Proactively assessing a potential employer goes beyond standard interviews; asking to *discuss* their code (best & worst examples) can reveal more about their development practices and priorities than simply reviewing the code itself. While direct access to code or employee contacts is unlikely, framing the request as a conversation starter demonstrates thoughtful due diligence. Be prepared for varied responses – some organizations lack self-awareness regarding technical debt, while others may have policies preventing such disclosures.

*Source: [Is it reasonable to ask a potential employer for samples of their code and/or em](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/113051) — answer by Martin Tournoij, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker is a software engineer trapped in a highly controlling job where they are actively monitored to prevent them from interviewing for other positions, and cannot easily take calls outside of work hours due to this surveillance.**

While it's understandable the current employer is unreasonable, always *ask* potential employers for interview flexibility – most will accommodate requests for times outside standard business hours, especially during initial screening. Don’t assume inflexibility; many companies recognize the value of candidates and are willing to be accommodating. Presenting constraints (like needing to work around a demanding schedule) as reasonable needs can often lead to solutions.

*Source: [How can I take an interview while at a job that tries to prevent interviewing?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/150596) — answer by Matthew Gaiser, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The candidate received a take-home task heavily focused on Product Management for a role transitioning from Software Engineering. They underestimated the skill gap and time commitment, leading to burnout and an unpresentable deliverable.**

Honesty and self-awareness are crucial when facing challenges during the interview process. Acknowledging a skills mismatch and withdrawing gracefully preserves professional relationships better than submitting subpar work. This situation is also a valuable opportunity for career reflection – identifying desired paths and proactively addressing skill gaps.

*Source: [What should I do if I'm not able to complete a take home task for an interview?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/115097) — answer by Philip Kendall, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner wants to provide constructive feedback to a senior developer candidate who performed poorly in an interview and is suspected of using Google to answer questions, but doesn't want to directly accuse them of cheating.**

When delivering negative feedback, focus on the *impact* of observed behaviors rather than making assumptions about intent. Instead of calling out potential dishonesty, describe the lack of depth in their responses – highlighting a disconnect between surface-level knowledge and true understanding. This approach maintains professionalism while still conveying areas for improvement without being accusatory or subjective.

*Source: [Providing post-interview feedback to a candidate who I suspect was googling answ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/104273) — answer by AakashM, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The applicant received feedback on a failed technical test revealing flawed 'correct' answers – specifically regarding SQL query efficiency and handling dynamic data – and is concerned about their recruiter perceiving them as lacking expertise.**

When faced with demonstrably incorrect assessment criteria, it can be worthwhile to politely provide constructive feedback through the recruiter. Focus on explaining *why* your approach is superior in terms of scalability or real-world application, framing it as a desire to contribute to the company's success rather than simply correcting their test. Avoid accusatory language and prioritize demonstrating expertise over pointing out flaws in others’ work.

*Source: [I flunked a technical test because some of their expected answers were wrong! Sh](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/153349) — answer by bharal, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker accepted a dinner invitation from a potential client, discussed a project, and then received a significantly low offer which led to the client becoming angry when countered. They are questioning if they mismanaged the situation.**

It's standard practice for clients to 'court' potential hires with meals as part of their pitch, and accepting doesn’t create an obligation. Skilled professionals strategically delay rate discussions until after establishing value, hoping to leverage interest into better compensation. This client demonstrated poor business acumen by not addressing budget constraints upfront, suggesting the asker likely avoided a problematic working relationship.

*Source: [Turned down a client after accepting dinner, how could I have handled this bette](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/65660) — answer by mcknz, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is in a job lacking fundamental software development practices and fears detailing this during interviews will negatively impact their candidacy.**

Focus on demonstrating *knowledge* of best practices, not necessarily current application of them. Supplement professional gaps with personal projects that showcase these skills – this proves initiative and commitment to quality. If pressed for examples from work, honestly state the lack of those practices while highlighting your self-directed learning as a proactive response.

*Source: [My current job follows "worst practices". How can I talk about my experience in ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/140843) — answer by Jayce444, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker accepted a job based on a promised raise that never materialized, and is now finding the work environment unsatisfactory after only two weeks. They are concerned about how to explain this very short tenure to future employers.**

When addressing brief employment periods in interviews, prioritize minimizing negative framing. It's often best to omit extremely short-lived roles if possible; otherwise, a concise explanation focusing on a 'significant change to the position' is sufficient. If pressed for details, be truthful about compensation being the core issue, but frame it as a shift in expectations rather than solely a salary dispute.

*Source: [Leaving a job that I just took based on false promise of a raise. What do I tell](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/145063) — answer by BSMP, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker was kept waiting two hours for an interview with a potential employer in the film industry, and after receiving an apology, responded by withdrawing their interest.**

Maintaining professionalism is crucial even when feeling slighted, especially as someone new to an industry. While you have the right to choose who you work with, responding defensively or dismissively can damage your reputation and future opportunities. Recognizing power dynamics in job seeking – where employers have more options than applicants – means being strategic about preserving potential connections, even if imperfect.

*Source: [Interviewer was two hours late](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/173381) — answer by dan.m was user2321368, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The applicant inflated their current salary during an interview and is now being asked for proof of income, creating a difficult situation with a potentially unethical employer. They also received new terms (a commitment period) late in the process.**

It's generally unwise to discuss past or present compensation; focus negotiations on the value you bring to the *new* role and desired future earnings. Directly refusing unreasonable requests, like providing pay stubs, is acceptable and avoids further complications. Don’t feel obligated to over-explain a rejection – a simple 'no thank you' is sufficient if the offer doesn't meet your needs or trust is broken.

*Source: [Falsely claimed current salary higher than actual in an interview and now I'm be](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/94865) — answer by user73742, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner wants to know if it’s appropriate to view the LinkedIn profiles of their interviewers before a job interview to gain insight, and whether referencing that research during the interview is acceptable.**

LinkedIn exists as a platform for professional networking and information sharing; researching those you'll be interacting with professionally is expected. Demonstrating initiative by learning about your interviewers shows engagement and preparation. While directly stating 'I saw it on LinkedIn' isn’t necessary, leveraging the knowledge gained to ask thoughtful questions can positively influence an interviewer.

*Source: [Spying on potential employer's LinkedIn](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/127029) — answer by Steve, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is struggling to manage multiple job offers arriving at different speeds and wants advice on how to buy time with leading companies without damaging relationships while still evaluating all options.**

Transparency and honesty are key when navigating simultaneous job opportunities. Proactively informing each company about the status of other processes—both positive and negative—demonstrates respect and allows them to adjust accordingly. While it's reasonable to request a short period for consideration, avoid excessive delays; prioritizing open communication builds trust and ultimately leads to the best outcome.

*Source: [How do I coordinate the process of pursuing multiple job opportunities at the sa](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/111) — answer by jcmeloni, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker is puzzled by reports of candidates being rejected for jobs despite being overqualified and willing to accept lower pay, questioning if 'overqualified' is just a polite rejection tactic.**

Companies prioritize long-term employee retention and team stability. Hiring involves significant costs beyond salary, so employers avoid 'flight risks' – those likely to leave quickly due to boredom, better offers, or resentment. They also consider potential disruptions caused by an unhappy or ambitious overqualified employee, including challenges to existing authority structures and concerns about hidden motives.

*Source: [Why do companies not want to hire over qualified people?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/30544) — answer by CaptainCodeman, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker is concerned that stated commitments to code quality during interviews often don't match reality upon closer inspection of actual codebase and wants to know how to proactively assess a potential employer’s coding practices before accepting a job.**

Directly requesting production code access is unlikely to be granted, so focus on indirectly assessing their commitment to quality through targeted questions about their development processes. Inquire about version control, bug reporting, code review procedures, legacy code maintenance strategies, and tools used for enforcing standards. While interview responses should be viewed with healthy skepticism, these questions can reveal a company's true priorities and practices.

*Source: [How can I ask a potential employer to show production code?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/34126) — answer by David K, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is concerned about whether remaining at their current software development job for longer than two years will negatively impact future job prospects, despite being satisfied with the role's growth opportunities, compensation, and company culture.**

Prioritizing professional growth and financial stability within a positive work environment outweighs adhering to arbitrary timelines like the 'two-year rule'. Demonstrating consistent development and relevant skills is more important than frequent job hopping. Stability can be viewed as a strength by employers, indicating adaptability and commitment, so focus on articulating your reasons for staying when questioned.

*Source: [Is staying in the first job for a long time (>2 yrs) a bad thing?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/105390) — answer by OnoSendai, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker took notes during an informal interview with an acquaintance, and the interviewer reacted negatively, claiming they should have asked permission first and likened note-taking to recording without consent.**

This situation highlights a potential red flag regarding the interviewer's professionalism and approach to collaboration. While respecting boundaries is important, equating note-taking to recording demonstrates controlling behavior and a lack of trust. Prioritizing open communication about confidentiality concerns (like using an NDA) would have been more appropriate than criticizing standard interview practice.

*Source: [Interviewer complained that I was taking notes](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/191837) — answer by Stephan Branczyk, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is scheduled to interview a candidate who previously 'no-showed' an interview at a former company and wonders if that past behavior should disqualify him, or if they should remove themselves from the process due to potential bias.**

Everyone makes mistakes, even well-prepared candidates, and unexpected issues can derail anyone’s best intentions. It’s important to remember that unprofessional behavior isn't always indicative of character; companies often fall short in professionalism as well, so extending grace is reasonable. Furthermore, the responder cautions against using potentially improperly obtained information from a previous employer and suggests avoiding escalation.

*Source: [Should I interview someone who ditched an interview before?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/124827) — answer by BigMadAndy, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Salary

**The questioner accepted a significantly higher-paying job and, during their exit interview, admitted leaving primarily due to salary; their manager reacted negatively, claiming it was unprofessional not to ask for a raise first and threatened a negative reference.**

Prioritizing your financial well-being is valid, especially when previously limited by circumstances. The manager's reaction appears motivated by frustration over losing an employee at a low cost, rather than genuine professional concern. It’s important to recognize manipulative behavior in the workplace and not internalize blame for seeking better opportunities; focus on moving forward.

*Source: [Was it really unprofessional of me to leave without asking for a raise first?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/138987) — answer by solarflare, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**This temporary employee automated significant portions of their job and is now being asked to fully automate key processes – effectively eliminating the need for their position – without any discussion of a permanent role or commensurate compensation.**

Proactively demonstrating value through exceptional work, even when it potentially impacts your own short-term security, can open doors to long-term opportunities. Avoid focusing on what you *aren't* being paid for and instead emphasize your commitment to the company’s success while simultaneously pursuing both internal and external job applications. A strong work ethic and positive attitude are valuable assets that will be recognized regardless of the outcome at this specific organization.

*Source: [How to handle being asked to automate jobs as a temp worker](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/124209) — answer by Old_Lamplighter, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner wants a detailed guide to determining an appropriate salary request, considering all relevant factors beyond just a single data point.**

Effective salary negotiation requires thorough research using multiple sources like online databases and professional networking. Beyond job title, location significantly impacts pay due to cost of living, local supply/demand for skills, and tax implications. Finally, demonstrating valuable experience, education, and especially in-demand skillsets strengthens your position to request a competitive rate.

*Source: [How can I determine a reasonable salary to ask for?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/896) — answer by Atif, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is asking if the conventional wisdom that 'the first person to name a salary in negotiation loses' holds true, especially considering situations like mandatory salary history disclosures or avoiding wasted time. They also wonder if appearing inflexible might be more damaging than stating a desired salary.**

Successful negotiation often involves delaying revealing your expectations and redirecting the question back to the employer. This allows you to gather information about their budget and potentially secure a higher offer, as they are more likely to increase from their initial number than you are to decrease yours. While transparency is valuable, strategically withholding specifics until later in the process can create leverage, but it's important to remain polite and focus on demonstrating your value.

*Source: [Does the first person to mention a number in a salary negotiation lose?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/183) — answer by Vinnyroe, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner fears being let go from their small company after a lucrative project ends, as the CEO hints at hiring new developers at lower rates and has previously mentioned their current salary is high for the industry.**

Voluntarily accepting a pay cut signals a lack of self-worth and can ironically *increase* the likelihood of job loss. Instead of diminishing your value, proactively demonstrate it by requesting a raise – highlighting your contributions and the costs associated with replacing you. Focus on proving your worth rather than preemptively lowering expectations or apologizing for your current compensation.

*Source: [Should I volunteer for a pay cut?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/122412) — answer by gnasher729, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A freelance developer was asked to significantly reduce their established hourly rate by a client citing 'budget problems,' despite having already been paid at the original rate for work completed and without a formal contract.**

Protecting your value as a professional means consistently billing for all hours worked and recognizing that 'budget issues' are often negotiation tactics. Accepting reduced rates erodes trust and sets a precedent for future exploitation, so it’s crucial to confidently maintain your pricing or be prepared to seek other clients. Prioritizing self-respect in negotiations is essential for long-term success.

*Source: [Client wants to reduce hourly rate at the start of a new project](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/95022) — answer by Xavier J, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker discovered their senior coworker seems significantly underpaid compared to market rates and fears losing them as a valuable team member. They are seeking advice on how to address this with management.**

Instead of involving the boss, directly encourage your colleague to advocate for themselves. A manager is more likely to act when presented with a direct request from an employee expressing dissatisfaction. Remind the coworker of their value and that negotiating salary is standard practice; ultimately, retention relies on them initiating the conversation.

*Source: [I have reason to believe that my very competent coworker is being severely under](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/113387) — answer by Laetus, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker was asked by a future employer (a bank) to provide a photo of both sides of their bank card, including the CVV, before starting work and questioned whether this request was safe or standard practice.**

Professionals should be wary of requests for sensitive personal information, even from seemingly legitimate sources. Organizations—especially those handling finances—should *already* understand data security best practices and not ask for unnecessary details like full card images. It's crucial to push back on such requests and offer alternative, secure methods of verification (like IBAN/BIC) or consult with your own financial institution before complying.

*Source: [Sending a photo of my bank account card to the future employer](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/140366) — answer by Gregory Currie, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner wonders if explicitly mentioning gender during salary negotiation as a woman in tech will help close the pay gap, given recent media attention to the issue.**

Focus your negotiation solely on your qualifications, experience, and market value – there shouldn't be separate rates for men and women. As an external candidate, you have more leverage to achieve a fair rate based on merit than someone seeking internal promotion. Know your worth, confidently state your expectations, and be prepared to walk away if they aren’t met; don't rely on appeals to equity as a negotiation tactic.

*Source: [Should I point out that I'm a woman when negotiating starting salary?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/69858) — answer by Jane S, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A consultant in Italy is facing a pay reduction because their company is refunding a client for the poor work of a previous consultant, and management intends to cover the cost by deducting it from the current consultant's salary.**

Employers cannot unilaterally reduce an employee’s agreed-upon compensation, even to recoup losses from another party. While highlighting issues with prior work is necessary, focusing on problems rather than assigning blame can improve internal communication and avoid escalating conflict. It's crucial to address illegal pay deductions through internal channels (manager, HR) but be prepared to seek legal counsel if the issue isn’t resolved.

*Source: [How can I handle my company docking my pay due to poor quality of previous consu](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/90443) — answer by dirkk, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A female developer discovered she is earning significantly less than male colleagues in similar roles, despite increased responsibilities and having been promised a raise that never materialized. She's feeling undervalued and considering leaving her job.**

When addressing pay inequity, focus on presenting objective facts – salary comparisons, dates of requests, and role changes – as part of a formal, written request to management and HR. Frame the issue as a business negotiation based on market value and legal obligations (equal pay), remaining professional and avoiding emotional appeals or threats. While demonstrating loyalty is fine, be prepared to act on your worth if a satisfactory response isn't received within a reasonable timeframe.

*Source: [How can I address being paid less than my male colleagues with similar or lesser](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/116036) — answer by Richard, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is facing a manager who deflects salary requests by claiming their pay is already high *compared to colleagues*, despite a company policy preventing salary discussion and the asker's focus on demonstrating value.**

When faced with irrelevant comparisons in negotiation, firmly redirect the conversation back to your own worth and potential opportunities elsewhere. Frame the issue as an economic one – you are evaluating options based on what you *could* earn, not simply comparing yourself internally. Be prepared to walk away if a mutually beneficial agreement isn't possible; focusing on needs clarifies whether staying is truly viable.

*Source: [Salary discussion with manager and his counter argument that I am well paid](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/110472) — answer by Daniel, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**This software engineer feels significantly underpaid compared to market rates, despite consistent raises, and wants advice on whether and how to ask for a mid-year raise, potentially tied to completing a professional certification.**

Successfully requesting a raise requires framing the conversation around value delivered to the company, not just personal needs or comparisons. Focus on quantifying accomplishments – projects led, goals achieved, money saved/earned, and expanded responsibilities – to demonstrate increased worth. Timing is also key; aligning the request with demonstrable achievements (like certification completion) or performance reviews increases chances of success, while preparing for various responses shows professionalism.

*Source: [How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/1025) — answer by voretaq7, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**An IT professional building an integration between their company’s internal systems and a third-party accounting platform realized they have access to sensitive payroll data, and is questioning whether looking at it would be unethical.**

Prioritize system safety and data privacy above all else during development. Building against live financial data carries significant risk of error with potentially devastating consequences; always utilize dedicated test environments with fabricated data. Maintaining professional boundaries and respecting employee privacy are crucial, regardless of company size or perceived familiarity.

*Source: [Is it wrong to peek at a colleague's paycheck?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/125827) — answer by unknown, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is concerned about two clauses in their German employment contract: one seemingly requiring unlimited unpaid overtime, and another forbidding discussion of salary with colleagues. They want to know if these are legally enforceable.**

German courts have generally found broad 'unpaid overtime' clauses illegal unless the employee is a high earner (over €76,200 annually) *and* the amount of potential overtime is specifically quantified in the contract. Similarly, employers cannot legally prevent employees from discussing their salaries; pay isn’t considered a trade secret and restricting this conversation places an unfair burden on the worker. While these clauses are common in older German contracts due to lack of legal updates, they aren't binding on the employee.

*Source: [Can a German employer force mandatory overtime and forbid salary discussion?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/149134) — answer by nvoigt, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A potential client offered services in exchange for event access instead of monetary compensation, which the asker finds unacceptable as it doesn’t align with their business needs and has no personal value.**

Professionally declining non-monetary payment requires a polite but firm response that reiterates your standard practice of accepting cash. Focus on offering to provide a quote *after* scoping the project, subtly shifting the conversation back to financial terms without directly criticizing their initial offer. This approach maintains a positive tone while clearly establishing boundaries and prioritizing appropriate compensation.

*Source: [Potential client wants to pay in free stuff not money, how should I respond?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/65429) — answer by Adam Davis, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**An employee relocated internationally based on a promised salary increase after three months, which wasn't included in their contract but was confirmed via email; now the employer is reneging due to budget concerns despite continuing other discretionary spending.**

Verbal agreements and promises outside of a written contract are rarely reliable, especially when an employer demonstrates inflexibility during negotiation. It’s crucial to insist on including all key terms in the final contract before making significant life changes based on those terms; walking away from unfavorable conditions is often the strongest course of action. Proactively questioning the longevity of verbal promises and outlining potential consequences can highlight the risk inherent in relying on unwritten commitments, but ultimately, protecting oneself requires a solid contractual foundation.

*Source: [Employer reneged on negotiated clauses that weren't part of agreed contract, cit](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/147156) — answer by Stephan Branczyk, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner, a salaried employee with consistently strong performance, is being pressured by their manager to work beyond established hours despite completing all tasks effectively within a standard workday.**

While some employers expect dedication to be demonstrated through long hours, prioritizing work-life balance and setting boundaries is valid, especially when deliverables are consistently met. High performers have leverage; clearly communicating your needs and being prepared to seek alternative employment if those needs aren't respected can effectively establish healthy working conditions. Don’t internalize the idea that ‘more work’ always equates to needing *more hours* – efficient time management should be valued.

*Source: [Is it wrong to manage my time in such a way that I don't have to work past 5:00 ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/183912) — answer by Yves Gurcan, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Recruitment

**The asker needs to hire someone to mediate between their inclusive team and a notoriously sexist IT department, and worries about unfairly influencing their decision based on the candidate's gender due to the likely negative experience the woman would face.**

Prioritize legally sound hiring practices by focusing solely on qualifications during selection. Transparency is key; inform the final candidate about the challenging environment of one team *before* they accept the role, allowing them to make an informed decision. Incorporate meetings with both teams into the late-stage interview process as a 'cultural fit' check for all candidates – not just women – providing valuable insight without introducing bias.

*Source: [How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very se](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/130530) — answer by Myles, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The candidate received an enthusiastic signal from the hiring manager about a job offer, but the subsequent salary negotiation with the in-house recruiter was aggressive, unprofessional, and focused on minimizing compensation despite positive interview feedback.**

When a disconnect exists between a hiring manager's intent and HR's approach, directly communicating concerns to the hiring manager can be effective. This demonstrates your enthusiasm while addressing problematic behavior that could jeopardize the offer. Prioritizing a respectful negotiation process is crucial, and escalating issues when those standards aren’t met shows you value professional interactions.

*Source: [How to negotiate salary with an extremely unprofessional in-house recruiter?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/84599) — answer by AndreiROM, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker's company maintains critical systems built on extremely outdated technologies (COBOL, ancient Java versions, etc.) and struggles to find developers willing to work on them.**

Instead of seeking specialists in these legacy languages, focus recruitment on experienced developers who are adaptable and motivated by compensation. Frame the position as a learning opportunity for seasoned professionals rather than requiring pre-existing expertise. Emphasize long-term job security and a competitive salary to attract those nearing retirement or looking for stable work, while also acknowledging that outdated development environments may be a hurdle.

*Source: [How to attract people to work on very old and outdated technologies?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/115206) — answer by gnasher729, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**Recruiters are finding it difficult to assess true problem-solving skills in junior developers because candidates are heavily preparing for common interview questions, leading to memorization rather than genuine understanding.**

Traditional technical interviews focused on pre-defined problems are failing to identify adaptable and resourceful developers. Shifting the focus to live coding with realistic, imperfect projects allows recruiters to observe a candidate's approach to unfamiliar challenges and their ability to think critically under pressure. This method prioritizes practical skill demonstration over rote memorization of solutions.

*Source: [How do we recruit junior software developers in an age where everybody studies f](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/125402) — answer by user1666620, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker's company maintains critical systems built on extremely outdated technologies (COBOL, ancient Java versions, etc.) and struggles to find developers willing to work on them.**

Instead of seeking specialists in these legacy languages, focus recruitment on experienced developers who are adaptable and motivated by compensation. Frame the position as a learning opportunity for seasoned professionals rather than requiring pre-existing expertise. Emphasize long-term job security and a competitive salary to attract those nearing retirement or looking for stable work, while also acknowledging that outdated development environments may be a hurdle.

*Source: [How to attract people to work on very old and outdated technologies?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/115206) — answer by Matthieu M., CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker repeatedly asks recruiters about specific technologies used in potential roles but receives evasive answers, leading to wasted time and frustration. They are unsure how to firmly request this information without appearing impolite.**

Prioritize directness and clarity when communicating essential requirements to recruiters; state your needs as non-negotiable criteria for considering a role. It's acceptable to politely but firmly end the conversation if those core needs aren’t addressed, recognizing that *they* are being disrespectful of your time by avoiding a simple answer. Framing it as a statement of what you seek—rather than a demand—maintains professionalism and avoids appearing confrontational.

*Source: [How do I tell recruiters I don't want to go forward until they answer my questio](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/179180) — answer by matt freake, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**An employee is concerned that including specific retro video game skills as 'bonus' qualifications in an IT job advertisement could be perceived as discriminatory, despite the hiring manager claiming it’s just for fun and cultural fit.**

While likely not legally discriminatory, adding irrelevant ‘personality-fit’ criteria to a job ad is unprofessional and can confuse applicants. Focusing on actual skills needed for the role creates clarity and broadens the applicant pool; prioritizing perceived 'cultural fit' risks excluding qualified candidates and projecting an immature company image. Job ads should prioritize clear expectations of required competencies over subjective preferences.

*Source: [Is it discriminatory to put "bonus" video game skills in a job advertisement?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/124482) — answer by David K, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner asked a recruiter if 7pm was an acceptable time for an initial call, and the recruiter responded dismissively, implying they weren’t serious about job searching because of the request.**

While the questioner's request wasn't unreasonable, the recruiter's response was unprofessional. It's perfectly acceptable for both candidates and recruiters to have scheduling limitations; a good match requires flexibility on both sides. Don't internalize such comments as reflecting your commitment – recognize it simply indicates a lack of compatibility.

*Source: [Is it appropriate for a recruiter to tell me I need to be able to take calls dur](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/98824) — answer by Erik, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**An employee received a strange contract from a recruiter *after* starting a new job, demanding updates on technical work and claiming partial ownership of created software – conflicting with their employment agreement.**

Trust your instincts when something feels wrong with a contract, especially after the initial hiring process is complete. Immediately involve your manager or HR to handle unusual requests from external parties; they are best equipped to protect company interests and address potential conflicts. This situation highlights the importance of clear boundaries between recruitment agencies and the companies they serve, particularly regarding intellectual property.

*Source: [Recruiter demanding I sign dodgy paperwork after joining job](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/87695) — answer by SliderBlackrose, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner's friend was subjected to a series of unreasonable requests by someone who later revealed they were evaluating her as a potential employee, leading the questioner to suspect unethical recruitment practices.**

This 'testing' tactic reveals more about the prospective employer than the candidate; it suggests a preference for compliance over problem-solving and potentially indicates manipulative behavior. A healthy work environment encourages clear communication and respect, not deliberately creating frustrating scenarios. Consider whether accepting a role with someone exhibiting this pattern aligns with your personal boundaries and professional values.

*Source: [Is being tested by a "customer" a common or appropriate recruitment technique?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/152051) — answer by Matthew Gaiser, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is skeptical of corporate diversity initiatives, wondering if they are merely public relations exercises or if there’s genuine professional benefit to building diverse teams beyond simply hiring the most qualified candidates.**

While meritocracy effectively identifies competence, true innovation and problem-solving arise from cognitive diversity – different perspectives challenging assumptions. Diverse teams outperform homogeneous ones by focusing on facts and avoiding blind spots that can lead to critical errors. Building a high-performing team isn't about collecting '10X' individuals; it’s about assembling a group with varied skills, experiences, and priorities that complement each other.

*Source: [Does diversity provide anything that meritocracy does not?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/130088) — answer by Glen Pierce, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Internship

**An unpaid intern received feedback questioning their dedication because they consistently finished assigned tasks and left at the scheduled end time, despite receiving positive performance reviews on the quality of their work. They are now being implicitly pressured to work beyond established hours.**

The advice centers around recognizing exploitative behavior in a workplace, even within an internship. The response highlights that expecting significant unpaid labor – especially after tasks are completed – is a major red flag and indicative of a potentially toxic environment. Prioritizing self-respect and well-being by leaving the position is recommended because there's minimal professional risk given the lack of compensation.

*Source: [Is it reasonable to expect overtime from unpaid interns?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/92965) — answer by Steve-O, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner, an intern, is concerned about whether their need for frequent short breaks during programming work indicates laziness or inefficiency, despite consistently delivering high-quality work ahead of schedule.**

Effective programming demands regular mental rest due to its cognitively intensive nature; brief diversions can actually *improve* problem-solving ability. It's normal and even beneficial to incorporate small, scheduled breaks into the workday – beyond just lunch – to maintain focus and prevent burnout. Prioritizing well-being doesn’t necessarily equate to being unproductive, especially in roles requiring creative thinking.

*Source: [Is it normal to take lots of breaks in a programming job?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/65522) — answer by MealyPotatoes, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is tasked with extending a job offer to a promising intern but believes the company is failing and the direct manager is difficult, creating an ethical dilemma about potentially setting the candidate up for a bad experience.**

Navigating this situation requires balancing loyalty to the company with concern for the candidate's career. The advice centers on subtly communicating concerns during a private conversation without explicitly advising against accepting the offer or jeopardizing your position. Focus on highlighting potential cultural mismatches and upcoming changes, allowing the candidate to draw their own conclusions while maintaining professional boundaries.

*Source: [Making a job offer to a candidate while privately advising them to decline](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/122643) — answer by BigMadAndy, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A software developer is dealing with interns who are deliberately disregarding professional coding standards (specifically naming conventions) and engaging in mocking behavior, despite being given clear guidance.**

Addressing unprofessional conduct, even in a learning environment, requires direct but measured feedback. It's important to connect technical practices like code clarity to broader workplace expectations of respect and maintainability. The goal is not just correcting the immediate issue, but establishing boundaries and preparing interns for professional norms.

*Source: [How to handle interns' unprofessional behavior?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/94771) — answer by SaggingRufus, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker is being asked by a former employer to fix a bug in code written during an internship, over a year after the contract ended, while now employed full-time elsewhere.**

Once employment ends, responsibility for maintaining or fixing past work shifts to the employer. While it's commendable to want to help, offering free assistance can devalue your professional skills and potentially create conflicts with your current job. It’s acceptable to politely decline or propose a paid contract, but always prioritize transparency with your present employer before taking on additional work.

*Source: [My previous employer has asked me to fix a bug in code that I wrote for them](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/120952) — answer by MikeQ, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**An intern declined a full-time job offer after completing their internship, choosing instead to pursue further education and prioritize personal well-being. Their boss is now attempting to guilt-trip them into staying on longer than their contract requires to help with the transition.**

Prioritize your own needs and commitments, even when facing pressure from others. It's acceptable to firmly but politely push back against manipulative tactics that attempt to create obligation beyond what’s agreed upon. Remember you fulfilled your contractual obligations and are not responsible for managing their staffing issues; redirecting responsibility is a valid response. Ultimately, making difficult decisions aligned with long-term goals is sometimes necessary despite potential disappointment from others.

*Source: [Boss making me feel guilty for leaving the company at the end of my internship](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/138285) — answer by Keith, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker is an intern performing repetitive, non-technical data entry tasks with no coding or developer interaction, leading to dissatisfaction despite wanting to maintain a good relationship with the company.**

When faced with unchallenging work, proactively identify opportunities to apply technical skills and automate processes – even if it's outside your assigned duties. This demonstrates initiative, builds valuable experience for your resume, and provides compelling interview material. While seeking better assignments is reasonable, focusing on self-directed learning and problem solving can yield positive outcomes regardless of the company’s willingness to fully integrate you into technical work.

*Source: [Is it normal for a computer science intern to not work with any code or develope](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/160453) — answer by mxyzplk, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker is frustrated with an intern who, after four months and despite some initial promise, lacks fundamental software development skills and learns very slowly, requiring significant daily instruction.**

Effective internship management requires realistic expectations; interns are often in a long-term evaluation period rather than immediate contributors. Focus should shift from direct teaching to facilitating self-learning and identifying tasks where the intern *can* contribute meaningfully, even if it's not what was originally planned. Prioritize maintaining a positive company reputation (regarding how interns are treated) and understanding any legal constraints before considering termination.

*Source: [How to deal with an intern's lack of basic skills?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/82346) — answer by enderland, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Resume

**The user is considering whether to include details about past projects – specifically an aimbot and website scripting for ranking purposes – on their resume for a computer security software development role.**

Focusing on ethical, defensive security work is crucial when applying for professional roles. Demonstrating skill through constructive contributions like vulnerability patching or bot detection showcases valuable talent far more effectively than highlighting potentially damaging exploits. While technical ability might be present in 'grey area' projects, emphasizing positive and ethical achievements builds trust and demonstrates good character.

*Source: [Should I include controversial achievements in my resume?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/97610) — answer by Old_Lamplighter, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The applicant noticed formatting discrepancies between Chrome and Firefox when viewing their Google Docs resume/cover letter link, and wondered if they could professionally suggest using Chrome for optimal viewing.**

Prioritize delivering a consistently professional presentation by converting documents to a universal format like PDF before sharing. This ensures readability across all platforms without requiring the recipient to use specific software or browsers. Asking viewers to use a particular browser can appear unusual and raise questions about the document's quality or your technical understanding.

*Source: [Is it unprofessional to mention your cover letter and resume are best viewed in ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/141318) — answer by DarkCygnus, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The user worked at a company named 'ISIS Technologies' and is concerned the name will negatively impact job applications due to its association with the terrorist group, despite it being an unrelated, pre-existing entity. They are currently using different names on their CV versus LinkedIn.**

Prioritize accuracy and transparency in your resume above all else; use the official company name as it appears in records, even if potentially problematic. While most people will understand the context, a discrepancy between your application and background check documentation creates unnecessary confusion and risk of delays or rejection. Avoid any action that could be perceived as dishonest, as background checks aren't always conducted with nuance.

*Source: [Previous company name is ISIS, how to list on CV?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/77952) — answer by Lilienthal, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The user wants to convey a preference for independent work on their CV while still appearing team-oriented, recognizing that most companies value collaboration. They are concerned about phrasing this effectively in English.**

It's best to avoid directly stating preferences on a CV; instead, demonstrate how the company will benefit from your skills. Focus on highlighting both collaborative *and* independent work capabilities as strengths, framing self-sufficiency and solo performance as positive attributes that lead to strong results. This approach subtly communicates preference without raising red flags about unwillingness to collaborate.

*Source: [How to politely write 'I work best when working alone' in a CV](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/113112) — answer by motosubatsu, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A new employee in India discovered their employer was falsifying resumes – inflating experience levels and adding nonexistent projects – to win client work, and is facing pressure after refusing to participate.**

This situation highlights the importance of prioritizing ethical integrity even at the potential cost of a job. While some companies may engage in deceptive practices, standing firm against them is crucial for long-term career health and professional reputation. Remaining with an unethical employer can be far more damaging than short-term unemployment, potentially hindering future success.

*Source: [My employer faked my resume to acquire projects](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/137096) — answer by Sourav Ghosh, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker received a promotion based on consistently delivering projects on time, even if it meant sacrificing code quality, and wants to know how to frame this achievement on their resume without highlighting the compromise in quality.**

Focusing on *results* rather than technical perfection is crucial, especially when facing deadlines. Prioritizing functional solutions that meet immediate business needs demonstrates valuable problem-solving skills and reliability. It's acceptable—and often smart—to deliver 'good enough' solutions for low-impact areas, freeing up resources for critical optimizations.

*Source: [What should I say on my resume if I got promoted for dropping code quality to me](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/156659) — answer by FooTheBar, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The user is concerned about how returning to a former employer after a short-term role elsewhere will be perceived by future employers, fearing it might appear as instability or poor judgment.**

Returning to a previous company isn't necessarily negative; in fact, it can demonstrate positive qualities like maintaining professional relationships and being valued by an organization. It signals you left on good terms and are seen as a reliable candidate. Don’t view it as a setback, but rather as evidence of your ability to build strong connections and be recognized for your contributions.

*Source: [Does returning to a previous employer look bad on a resume?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/83595) — answer by Hilmar, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The user is concerned a short-term role at a company linked to a public failure will harm their job search and is weighing whether to omit it from their resume.**

Don't automatically assume negative association due to a company’s failures; recruiters understand individuals aren't responsible for broader organizational outcomes. A brief employment gap often raises more red flags than acknowledging the role, even if linked to a failed project. Transparency and honesty are generally better strategies than attempting to conceal work history, as gaps will likely be questioned anyway.

*Source: [I worked for a company affiliated with a very publicly failed project. Should I ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/17070) — answer by DJClayworth, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Job Search

**The asker resigned from a consulting job with significant travel requirements after finding a new position, but the employer is unhappy about the timing – coinciding with a new client assignment – and attempting to extend the notice period, potentially delaying the start date of the new role.**

Employers will prioritize their own needs, so don't expect them to reciprocate 'fairness' when making business decisions. It’s perfectly acceptable to keep job search activities confidential until an offer is secured; transparency before that point can harm your position. Ultimately, a company's preparedness for staff turnover is *their* responsibility, and you are not obligated to sacrifice your new opportunity due to their lack of contingency planning.

*Source: [How do I deal with my current employer not respecting my decision to leave?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/79458) — answer by Dan Pichelman, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The user is wondering if it's acceptable to honestly state relocation due to their spouse’s job as the reason for leaving their current position, fearing it might be perceived negatively by potential employers.**

Authenticity is generally valued; prioritizing family isn't a professional flaw. While career dedication is important, a good employer understands life happens and respects personal commitments. Don't feel pressured to fabricate a more 'career-focused' reason if relocation is the truth – it’s a valid and understandable circumstance.

*Source: [Looking for a new job because of relocation - is it okay to tell the real reason](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/141771) — answer by sf02, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**This individual is struggling to find employment due to negative news coverage stemming from a dropped criminal investigation three years prior, despite efforts to suppress the information online. Their attempts at reputation management have backfired.**

Accepting that past negativity can't be erased is crucial; instead, focus on proactively shaping the narrative employers will form about you. Prioritize opportunities for direct interaction – like job fairs or smaller companies – to deliver your story *before* they find negative search results. Recognize you need to demonstrably exceed other candidates and highlight a unique value proposition that outweighs any perceived risk.

*Source: [Very bad online reputation is destroying my chances of getting a job](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/103310) — answer by Ben Barden, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The user prefers creating their CV in LaTeX (and exporting to PDF) but some recruiters insist on receiving an editable Word document, raising concerns about potential alterations and the cost of MS Word licensing.**

It's often recruitment *agencies*, not the hiring companies themselves, making this request. You can politely decline providing a Word file by citing lack of access to the software, while offering a PDF version with contact details removed as a compromise. This protects your CV’s integrity and acknowledges their need for an editable format without forcing you to purchase or use unwanted tools.

*Source: [I prepared my CV in LaTeX and exported it to PDF. How to deal with a recruiter w](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/113658) — answer by SpoonMeiser, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner, a junior web developer in London, is seeking job options that minimize social interaction with coworkers, having had a negative experience with the team-focused culture of startups.**

Successfully finding a role aligned with specific preferences requires proactive communication and research. Utilizing recruitment agencies allows for clearly stating desired (and undesired) workplace characteristics. Additionally, examining company websites for cultural emphasis – or lack thereof – and leveraging employee review sites can reveal environments that prioritize task completion over social bonding.

*Source: [How to find a job with as little social interaction with coworkers as possible?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/93579) — answer by Joe Strazzere, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker was let go from a Big 4 firm due to being overwhelmed by the workload, but now faces the expectation that their experience automatically equates to high performance and salary demands. They struggle with how to honestly explain their situation without appearing damaged goods.**

Your time at a prestigious firm *does* validate your professional capabilities; focus on framing your departure as a values mismatch rather than personal failure. Emphasize that the Big 4 environment prioritized extreme hours over sustainable work practices, and you're seeking a role where ambition and innovation aren’t sacrificed for quantity of hours worked. Most reasonable employers will appreciate this honesty and prioritize finding someone who prioritizes long-term contribution over burnout.

*Source: [Went to a big 4 but got fired for underperformance in a year recently - Now ever](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/141511) — answer by Borgh, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker received a direct invitation to apply for a job but realized upon reviewing the posting they don’t meet several key qualifications, leading them to question whether the initial encouragement was genuine or misleading.**

Job descriptions often represent ideal candidate profiles rather than strict requirements; recruiters frequently prioritize potential and overall fit over checking every box. Don't self-select out of applying simply because you lack some 'nice-to-have' skills, especially when directly encouraged to do so. Be upfront about any skill gaps during the interview process and express willingness to learn or address them.

*Source: [Got invited to apply for a job for which I don't qualify. How should I take this](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/114246) — answer by Old_Lamplighter, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## New Job

**A job applicant received a job offer and is concerned because the employer requested their bank account details *and* login credentials for an unrelated online account.**

This request is a clear sign of a scam. Legitimate employers have no need to access personal account passwords, and providing them creates significant security risks. The advice emphasizes immediate withdrawal from the situation and reporting it to both the platform where contact was made and relevant government authorities.

*Source: [Job asking for bank email and password](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/82855) — answer by keshlam, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker suspects their manager mistakenly conflated them with another candidate during the hiring process and now believes they have a skillset/experience they don’t possess, leading to mismatched project assignments.**

Focus on clarifying your actual skills and experience rather than speculating about a potential hiring error. Initiate a private conversation by gently correcting any misremembered details of your background, framing it as a simple misunderstanding instead of an accusation of mistake. Avoid self-blame or implying wrongdoing; you were hired based on *your* qualifications, not someone else's.

*Source: [How can I inform my boss that I may have been hired by mistake?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/101377) — answer by Joe Strazzere, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker received a job 'offer' with zero details (salary, hours, etc.) and is being pressured by the recruiter to withdraw other applications *before* receiving any concrete information about the role.**

A legitimate job offer should always include comprehensive details in writing before acceptance. Pressuring a candidate to commit or remove themselves from consideration for other roles without this information is highly unusual and potentially manipulative. It's perfectly acceptable – and advisable – to set clear boundaries, requesting a formal written offer before making any decisions about withdrawing applications, and being prepared to walk away if those terms aren’t met.

*Source: [Job offer without any details but asking me to withdraw other applications - is ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/143664) — answer by Joe Strazzere, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker received a job interview and was then asked by the prospective employer for access to the backend code of projects they developed *for their current employer*, raising concerns about professional boundaries and potential legal issues.**

Protecting your current (or past) employer's intellectual property is paramount, even when pursuing new opportunities. This request crosses a significant ethical line and likely violates employment agreements; a firm but polite refusal focusing on company policy is the correct response. Offering alternative demonstrations of skill – like tests or detailed discussions – demonstrates competence without compromising confidentiality.

*Source: [How to turn down request from prospective employer for current employer's code?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/116418) — answer by Drakemor, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner received conflicting signals from a hiring manager at their preferred company (Job-A), who advised against accepting other offers but hasn't provided a formal offer, while simultaneously facing an expiring offer from another company (Job-B). They are unsure whether to risk losing Job-B based on the hiring manager’s assurances.**

Prioritize securing confirmed employment over relying on verbal promises or implied intentions. A job isn't secured until there is a formal, signed offer in hand; don't hesitate to accept a firm offer while waiting for another potential opportunity. During negotiations, avoid revealing your preferences as this weakens your bargaining position and can be used against you, and remember that professional decisions are business transactions – accepting an offer doesn’t equate to burning bridges with other employers.

*Source: [Hiring manager asked me not to accept other offers but isn't extending a verbal ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/75971) — answer by Chris E, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A new employee received a team invitation to a farewell lunch for a coworker they haven't met and is unsure if they should attend.**

Team events are generally expected attendance, regardless of personal relationships with those being honored. Viewing it as an opportunity to learn about the company culture and build rapport with colleagues—even new ones—is more valuable than focusing on pre-existing familiarity. Prioritize attending unless a legitimate scheduling conflict arises; this demonstrates team spirit and proactive engagement.

*Source: [I just started; should I accept a farewell lunch for a coworker I don't know?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/139120) — answer by PagMax, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker started a new job only to discover that everyone who interviewed them had already left the company, raising concerns about potential instability and whether they should have seen this as a warning sign.**

Having an entire interview panel comprised of departing employees is highly unusual and suggests underlying issues within the organization. While it's not necessarily a dealbreaker now that employment has begun, it strongly indicates a possible pattern of high turnover or difficulty retaining staff. Proceed with cautious optimism, observe company dynamics closely, and be prepared for potential challenges.

*Source: [Everyone involved in my hiring process left the company before I started: is thi](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/128687) — answer by jcmack, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Hiring Process

**The questioner is struggling with how to practically improve diversity in their software engineering hiring process when initial candidate pools consistently lack representation, and fears being perceived as illegally prioritizing candidates based on demographic characteristics rather than merit.**

Focusing solely on evaluating the existing applicant pool won't solve a lack of diversity; instead, proactively broaden the reach of recruitment efforts to attract a more diverse range of applicants. Expanding advertising to target schools with diverse student bodies or welcoming relocation can increase representation in the initial stages. It’s crucial to remember that hiring decisions must always be based on qualifications and skills, not demographic factors.

*Source: [How, in practice, can I hire more diversely?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/128198) — answer by motosubatsu, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker received a job offer but then got a concerning, unsolicited email from a current employee warning them against accepting the position due to a negative company culture.**

When faced with conflicting information during a job search, it's crucial to investigate further rather than dismissing concerns outright. Proactively addressing red flags – even those delivered unconventionally – demonstrates self-respect and diligence. Specifically, looping in the hiring manager about the warning and carefully observing their reaction can reveal valuable insights into the company’s transparency and willingness to address internal issues.

*Source: [Interviewer privately warned me against taking the job](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/89567) — answer by Lilienthal, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker received a job offer from a hiring manager but was rejected by HR based on a group evaluation, despite having a strong work history with the company as a consultant.**

When facing internal conflict between a supportive manager and resistant HR, prioritize securing your value through existing channels. Leverage established relationships to expand scope of work and increase earning potential as a contractor rather than fighting an uphill battle for a direct position. This approach allows you to demonstrate competence without being subject to potentially biased or irrelevant evaluations.

*Source: [Manager wants to hire me; HR does not. How to proceed?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/138309) — answer by A. I. Breveleri, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker used a 'trap' instruction (including the word "sunshine") in their job ad to quickly filter out candidates who didn't read carefully, but this resulted in very few applicants and those who did follow the instruction were ultimately unqualified.**

Arbitrary filtering methods can inadvertently exclude strong candidates and should be re-evaluated if they aren’t yielding positive results. Focusing on a standard review of qualifications and ensuring competitive job offerings is more likely to attract a qualified pool of applicants than relying on unconventional 'tests'. Prioritize efficient evaluation over artificial screening, as the goal is finding skilled individuals, not punishing those who miss unusual requests.

*Source: [Should I keep asking candidates to include a specific word to filter out candida](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/127930) — answer by dwizum, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**This software programmer with a Computer Science degree is struggling to secure long-term employment and wants advice on when and how to disclose their profound deafness to potential employers during the hiring process.**

Disclosing your disability early in the recruitment process—ideally via email after initial contact—allows you to quickly identify potentially discriminatory companies and focus energy on those that are accepting. Framing it as a communication preference (e.g., requesting captioning or mentioning VRS) rather than a 'problem' can normalize the conversation. Prioritize finding an employer who values your skills, not one who views your deafness negatively; remember, many organizations actively seek diversity.

*Source: [How and when should I disclose that I'm deaf?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/71221) — answer by USER_8675309, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The applicant is in the final stages of a promising job offer but fears their current, abusive manager will sabotage their chances by refusing to provide a reference, and they risk termination if discovered to be applying elsewhere.**

When facing a seemingly insurmountable hurdle during hiring – like a problematic reference requirement – directly communicate the sensitive situation to the hiring manager. Highlight potential alternative contacts within your current company who *can* offer a positive assessment. Remember that strong candidates are often worth accommodating, and abusive behavior may be limited by HR policies, potentially opening avenues for legal recourse if deliberately misrepresented.

*Source: [Need to withdraw an application unless their HR changes their rules - how to do ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/152460) — answer by PeteCon, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Harassment

**The asker is experiencing unwanted advances from a new coworker who is friends with her boss; her attempts to address the issue with her boss were dismissed. The situation has escalated and she feels unsafe and unsupported.**

When facing harassment, direct and escalating verbal boundary setting is crucial, even if it feels uncomfortable. Prioritize making the behavior visible to others – not necessarily to *educate* the harasser (who likely knows what they're doing), but to create witnesses and shift the discomfort onto them. Document everything meticulously as evidence, and escalate to HR immediately when boundaries are ignored or physical safety is compromised.

*Source: [My boss' new hire, a friend of his, is making advances on me](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/86893) — answer by thursdaysgeek, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A man is being repeatedly and publicly criticized by a colleague about his personal appearance (beard and shaved head), escalating from 'jokes' to outright insults and attempts to rally others against him, causing significant discomfort.**

Ignoring or passively accepting disrespectful behavior, even if seemingly minor, can allow it to escalate into harassment and create a hostile work environment. It’s crucial to firmly address the issue directly and, if that fails, to involve HR or legal counsel to protect oneself from unacceptable treatment. Prioritizing self-respect and workplace boundaries is essential, regardless of perceived power dynamics.

*Source: [Colleague commenting negatively on my look](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/75918) — answer by Magisch, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner behaved inappropriately towards a higher-ranking coworker at a company party after consuming alcohol, specifically making unwanted physical contact. They are seeking advice on how to apologize and mitigate potential damage to their professional reputation.**

When addressing potentially inappropriate workplace behavior, direct unsolicited apologies can often exacerbate the situation by appearing manipulative or intimidating. It's generally best to allow the other person to initiate a conversation if they desire one; being prepared to sincerely apologize *if* approached is key. Focusing on consistently demonstrating professional conduct moving forward is more effective than attempting to 'fix' an isolated incident, especially when there’s a power dynamic involved.

*Source: [I messed up at the company party, got too drunk, flirted inappropriately. How do](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/81249) — answer by JohnHC, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Knowledge Transfer

**The questioner, a highly capable individual on small teams, realized after a hypothetical 'hit by a bus' scenario that they hadn't adequately prepared their colleagues to continue their work without them, specifically regarding specialized technical knowledge and tools.**

While team management ultimately bears responsibility for knowledge sharing, individuals should proactively create thorough documentation of their work – code, designs, fixes, and known issues. This isn’t just about writing docs; it's about advocating for a culture where documentation is integrated into the workflow and maintained alongside code. If systemic issues prevent effective knowledge transfer, raise concerns with leadership, but prioritize documenting what *you* can control.

*Source: [How can I prepare for getting hit by a bus?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/9128) — answer by Lightness Races in Orbit, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner, a highly capable individual on small teams, realized after a hypothetical 'hit by a bus' scenario that they hadn't adequately prepared their colleagues to continue their work without them, specifically regarding specialized technical knowledge and tools.**

While team management ultimately bears responsibility for knowledge sharing, individuals should proactively create thorough documentation of their work – code, designs, fixes, and known issues. This isn’t just about writing docs; it's about advocating for a culture where documentation is integrated into the workflow and maintained alongside code. If systemic issues prevent effective knowledge transfer, raise concerns with leadership, but prioritize documenting what *you* can control.

*Source: [How can I prepare for getting hit by a bus?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/9128) — answer by Matt, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner is concerned their generosity in sharing technical expertise with coworkers will backfire, potentially leading to being overlooked for projects or negatively impacting performance reviews as colleagues become equally skilled.**

While it's natural to worry about competition, hoarding knowledge ultimately limits both individual and team growth. Proactively sharing skills elevates the entire organization’s capabilities, increases your visibility as a valuable contributor, and solidifies your expertise through the act of teaching. Focusing on collaborative success is more likely to lead to recognition and opportunities than attempting to maintain exclusive skillsets.

*Source: [What is wrong with sharing knowledge with colleagues at work?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/42255) — answer by Myles, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Negotiation

**This person is preparing to negotiate a raise at their entry-level job but anticipates HR dismissing their salary research as inaccurate, potentially derailing the conversation and leading them to consider leaving.**

When faced with an employer disputing your market research, frame the disagreement as a key reason for *having* the negotiation – highlighting that differing perspectives exist. Be prepared to demonstrate your value by subtly signaling you have other options without making explicit threats; their unwillingness to adjust may indicate limited growth potential within the company. Ultimately, if they insist you're at the top of your range despite evidence to the contrary, it’s a strong signal to explore opportunities elsewhere where your skills are appropriately valued.

*Source: [Ways to respond when HR says your market salary range research isn't correct?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/123968) — answer by schizoid04, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**An employee had PTO approved by their previous manager but it was revoked by their new manager who now insists attendance at a conference is a condition of employment, creating a conflict with pre-paid vacation plans.**

When faced with unreasonable demands from a manager exceeding their authority, escalate the issue through proper channels like HR and involve prior leadership for support. Frame the dispute not as simple disagreement but as a financial burden on both parties to highlight the unreasonableness of the demand, and be prepared to follow through with leaving if necessary – demonstrating confidence in your value will strengthen your position. Don't make irreversible commitments (like booking travel) until the issue is resolved, and strategically share information that could deter future hires.

*Source: [New manager unapproved PTO my old manager approved, because of a conference at t](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/149375) — answer by gnasher729, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker faces a new policy allowing cigarette smoking in the office, causing health issues and considering immediate resignation despite being a valuable employee.**

When addressing unacceptable workplace conditions, avoid framing concerns as demands or ultimatums; instead, clearly state the issue and its impact on your ability to work. Escalating communication with documented evidence of legal violations can be effective, but only if you're prepared to follow through with further action. Using firm yet non-threatening language like 'deal-breaker' communicates seriousness without immediately resorting to threats.

*Source: [How do I professionally let my manager know I'll quit over cigarette smoke in th](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/138634) — answer by Summer, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Mentoring

**A senior IT professional is concerned that asking for help, even on specific technical issues where a colleague has expertise, is being perceived as a lack of competence by some junior team members, potentially impacting their credibility.**

Seeking assistance isn't a sign of weakness but rather demonstrates efficient problem-solving and acknowledges the impossibility of knowing everything. Leaders should prioritize completing tasks effectively over protecting ego, and model this behavior for the team. While you can’t control others’ perceptions, confidently owning your approach—seeking help when it saves time and effort—is crucial; address misperceptions directly if they arise by framing collaboration as a positive expectation.

*Source: [Asking for help in IT in a senior position while keeping credibility](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/98738) — answer by motosubatsu, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A mid-level developer needs to deliver critical feedback on code written by a junior colleague after having to quickly fix issues under deadline pressure, while being mindful of the junior's sensitivity and lack of experience.**

Effective criticism focuses on collaborative improvement rather than individual shortcomings. Frame feedback around 'our code' or 'this solution,' avoiding possessive language like 'your code' which can trigger defensiveness. Prioritize explaining *better* approaches and their benefits over dwelling on the flaws of existing work, and use positive framing to highlight improvements.

*Source: [When I need to constructively criticize someone's code, what can I do to "soften](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/153650) — answer by Player One, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**This professional is being asked to become a single point of failure for critical systems, and their attempts to mitigate this risk through knowledge sharing and hiring are being rejected by leadership who prioritize immediate output over long-term resilience.**

The advice centers on accepting that some situations are beyond an individual's control within an organization. While documenting work and building simple processes is helpful for personal preparedness, the ultimate responsibility for team structure and risk mitigation lies with management. It’s important to recognize when pushing back further will be unproductive and focus on executing assigned tasks.

*Source: [Company does not understand what the “bus factor” is and continues to give me mo](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/151245) — answer by Joe Strazzere, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Gender

**The questioner, a female engineer in a male-dominated field, feels uncomfortable with the term 'man hours' used at work and wants advice on whether to try and change the terminology or accept it as common jargon.**

Focusing on delivering high-quality work and maintaining a positive attitude is paramount for earning respect, regardless of gender. Attempting to correct potentially insensitive language can inadvertently draw unwanted attention to differences and create an uncomfortable dynamic; striving for equal treatment means accepting the same phrasing as everyone else. Prioritize being seen as a competent team member first, and address genuine disrespect rather than focusing on minor semantic issues.

*Source: [Is the term "man hours" appropriate for the workplace, and if not, how do I get ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/86002) — answer by Tempest16, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A female developer feels undermined by a senior male colleague who consistently verifies her technical input with other team members, despite her demonstrated competence, creating an unequal dynamic and requiring extra effort to be taken seriously.**

When addressing potentially sensitive workplace dynamics, focus on observable behaviors and their impact rather than attributing intent. Frame the issue as a communication breakdown or process inefficiency needing improvement, and invite your manager's perspective on how to resolve it. This approach opens dialogue without making accusations and allows for unforeseen reasons behind the behavior to surface.

*Source: [Should I talk to my team lead about unintentional sexism within the team?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/70670) — answer by Myles, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A new-hire female engineer is being asked to perform administrative tasks by an executive who appears to mistakenly believe she is part of the admin team, and her attempts at subtle correction haven’t worked.**

When facing misperceptions from senior leadership early in your career, leverage your manager as a buffer to address the issue. Framing the situation as seeking guidance on task prioritization allows you to highlight the mismatch without directly confronting the executive. Additionally, if unavoidable admin tasks arise, look for opportunities to apply engineering skills to improve efficiency and subtly demonstrate your core competencies.

*Source: [How do I tell an executive that I am an engineer not an admin](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/101850) — answer by anotherdave, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Job Offer

**The asker is resigning from a job after an acquisition negatively impacted the company culture, and wants to do so professionally given that a senior colleague recently resigned as well.**

Focus on maintaining professionalism in your resignation regardless of recent events; another departure isn't necessarily catastrophic. You are not responsible for how others react or interpret the situation, so prioritize delivering your notice respectfully without dwelling on negative aspects of the company. Accept that further departures may occur and avoid contributing to panic by simply handling your exit with grace.

*Source: [A coworker beat me to resignation. How can I resign in a professional manner?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/20357) — answer by Joe Strazzere, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A young developer is torn between staying at a comfortable but underpaying job with a good team, or accepting a significantly higher-paying position with a much shorter commute, despite feeling guilty about leaving his current colleagues during a busy period.**

Prioritize your own career growth and well-being; companies are responsible for managing their workload, not individual employees. While loyalty is admirable, it shouldn't come at the expense of substantial improvements to your financial situation and quality of life. A rare opportunity like doubling your salary warrants serious consideration, as such offers may not reappear frequently.

*Source: [Should I have concern for my previous workplace, when considering a new job?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/126413) — answer by Twyxz, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker was promised internal mobility after two years at their company but had a transfer request blocked by upper management despite positive performance and continued interest from the hiring team. They now have an external offer for a role they desire and are unsure if informing current management will help or backfire.**

This situation highlights that promises made during onboarding aren't always kept, and prioritizing employee growth isn’t necessarily valued by all levels of leadership. Accepting a counteroffer after seeking outside employment is often unwise; even if successful in the short term, it can create lasting negative perceptions and potential future repercussions. It's generally better to move on when an organization demonstrates disregard for your career aspirations, as patterns of behavior are unlikely to change.

*Source: [My management blocked my internal transfer, but now I have an outside offer. Sho](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/162688) — answer by A. I. Breveleri, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Applications

**The asker has two years of experience but is applying for roles requiring 3-7, and wants to know how to demonstrate sufficient skills despite lacking the stated experience level.**

Hiring managers prioritize 'people skills' and sound judgment as much or more than technical proficiency. Years of experience aren’t just about skill; they represent learned judgment gained through navigating failures and understanding practical application in real-world scenarios. Demonstrating raw talent isn't enough – employers seek candidates who have already made (and ideally, learned from) common mistakes elsewhere.

*Source: [How can I overcome "years of experience" requirements when applying to positions](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/1478) — answer by unknown, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The questioner had a brief personal encounter with a job candidate and, based on that interaction, has concerns about the candidate's character and potential negative impact on female team members. They want to know how to address these concerns without revealing the source of their information.**

Hiring decisions should primarily be based on professional assessment during the interview process, as behavior outside of work doesn’t necessarily reflect workplace conduct. It's important to acknowledge that you can't predict future behavior and must address issues *if* they arise in a professional setting. Allowing personal feelings to unduly influence objective evaluation risks creating bias and potentially hindering a good hire; focus on whether the candidate is a fit based on demonstrated skills and interview performance.

*Source: [How to disclose negative information about a candidate when I'd rather not revea](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/85896) — answer by unknown, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Raise

**A tech lead was met with resistance when asking a senior developer to take on a new project requiring skills outside of their usual scope, with the developer stating they weren't compensated for that type of work.**

It’s acceptable—and often best—to reassign tasks based on enthusiasm and willingness. Forcing someone onto a project they dislike won't improve performance or motivation; instead, prioritize team dynamics and individual engagement. While acknowledging the developer's concerns is polite, focusing on finding someone genuinely interested in the work will yield better results, and ongoing monitoring of negative attitudes may be necessary to address potential long-term issues.

*Source: [How to deal with an "I'm not paid enough to do this task" argument?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/83386) — answer by IDrinkandIKnowThings, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**The asker received a significant raise shortly after accepting another job offer and is concerned about appearing disloyal or ungrateful by still leaving their current position.**

Prioritize your own career goals, as companies ultimately act in their self-interest. While leaving soon after a raise might cause temporary disappointment for the employer, it's acceptable if the new opportunity better aligns with your long-term aspirations. Don’t sacrifice your future for perceived politeness; accepting benefits you’ve earned is reasonable even while pursuing other options.

*Source: [About to give in my notice, but suddenly got a raise. Will it reflect poorly on ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/114402) — answer by Neo, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Job Change

**The asker successfully automated significant portions of their role and is concerned about potential job loss, wanting to proactively discuss the situation with their boss and explore options for continued employment.**

Avoid prematurely assuming your employer's reaction or future needs. Instead of directly addressing potential layoffs, focus on initiating a conversation about long-term projects and how you can contribute value beyond your current tasks. Proactively suggesting areas where you could add value is often the safest approach, as it positions you as solution-oriented and demonstrates continued commitment. Skilled automation ability itself is valuable; don't underestimate its worth to the company.

*Source: [I'm about to automate myself out of a job. How do I approach my boss to discuss ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/77055) — answer by enderland, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**An employee who used their personal phone number in their email signature for work purposes is being asked to port the number to the company upon resignation, despite having owned it for years prior to employment and no agreement about transferring ownership.**

Personal assets used *for* a company are not automatically owned by the company simply because they were utilized during employment. Employers cannot legally withhold final pay over such an asset without facing significant penalties from labor authorities; documenting any threats of wage withholding is crucial for filing a complaint. Companies should have formally assumed responsibility (and billing) for work-related expenses like phone service if they intended to claim ownership or control, and failing to do so reinforces the employee's rights.

*Source: [Does my company own my phone number?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/159634) — answer by Stephan Branczyk, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Time Off

**An employee was asked to use unpaid time off after returning home early from a work conference, despite saving the company money on lodging and spending significant travel time getting there and back.**

Travel time directly related to work – including driving to and from conferences – is generally considered compensable work hours under US labor law. Employees should politely but firmly educate their managers about this principle, referencing official Department of Labor guidance when necessary. Framing the issue as a matter of legal compliance, rather than personal preference, can be an effective approach to resolving such disputes.

*Source: [Is it reasonable for my employer to make me use unpaid time off to drive back af](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/154728) — answer by Dmitry Grigoryev, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**An employee's previously approved time off was revoked last minute because a coworker requested the same dates, despite a stated 'first come, first served' policy and advance request guidance. The employee now faces financial loss due to non-refundable travel arrangements.**

When an employer creates a conflict with pre-approved commitments due to poor planning or changes in circumstance, it’s reasonable to negotiate for them to cover associated losses. Proactively framing the issue as a cost to *them* – rather than simply your inconvenience – can be effective. While not guaranteed, presenting a solution that requires minimal effort from the employer (like covering change fees) increases the likelihood of a positive outcome and demonstrates professional problem-solving.

*Source: [What to do when previously approved time off is being revoked at the last second](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/124136) — answer by Johnny, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Phone

**The asker receives calls for their manager where callers refuse to state the purpose of the call, leading to repeated unproductive interactions and a lack of useful information to pass along.**

Instead of offering availability which invites delay tactics, proactively gather essential information *before* considering a transfer. This shifts control of the conversation and allows for effective screening based on pre-defined criteria. Prioritizing information gathering demonstrates professionalism and prevents wasting time on calls that can be handled through other channels.

*Source: [How can I screen calls when callers refuse to tell me the nature of the call?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/67275) — answer by njzk2, CC-BY-SA 4.0*

**A junior developer is struggling to understand their overseas (India-based) colleagues during crucial training sessions, leading to slowed progress and frustration.**

Successfully collaborating with international teams often requires proactively addressing communication barriers beyond simply 'trying harder'. Investing in quality audio equipment for all parties is a foundational step. Instead of repeatedly asking for full repetitions, actively demonstrate listening by paraphrasing what *was* understood and requesting clarification on specific gaps – this fosters collaboration and reduces the burden on the speaker.

*Source: [Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleagues](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/132598) — answer by teego1967, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Autism Spectrum

**A manager is struggling with an autistic employee who publicly criticizes teammates via email, causing conflict and despite previous attempts at correction, the behavior persists because the employee doesn't understand the negative impact.**

When addressing behavioral issues with someone on the autism spectrum, prioritize directness and factual statements over emotional appeals or indirect communication. Avoid explaining *why* a behavior is harmful – instead, clearly state *what* needs to change and frame it as an expectation for job performance. Providing resources that explain social rules logically (like 'How to Win Friends') can also be helpful, but remember the diagnosis doesn't excuse disruptive behavior; accountability remains crucial.

*Source: [How do I deal with an autistic employee who criticizes teammates publicly and do](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/117206) — answer by Old_Lamplighter, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Benefits

**A highly productive engineer is refusing to submit new patent disclosures after the company drastically reduced financial incentives for doing so, and the manager suspects he’s hiding work done outside of regular hours.**

This situation highlights a breakdown in trust stemming from the company devaluing an employee's contributions. When incentives are removed without addressing employee concerns, particularly for high performers, it can lead to disengagement and even deception. Companies should anticipate such reactions when making significant policy changes and consider the long-term cost of losing valuable employees rather than focusing solely on short-term savings.

*Source: [Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/132387) — answer by Gregory Currie, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Mental Health

**An employee was verbally fired by an intoxicated manager, but the termination wasn't processed and the manager is now on medical leave. The employee is unsure whether to disclose this incident to their new temporary manager for fear of being terminated themselves.**

Transparency and honesty are crucial in professional situations, even when complicated by unusual circumstances. While it’s tempting to avoid a potentially negative outcome by remaining silent, withholding information can create bigger problems if discovered later. It's better to proactively explain the situation truthfully and allow leadership to address the inappropriate behavior of the previous manager.

*Source: [Fired by an Intoxicated Boss](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/83144) — answer by Draken, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Contracting

**The asker is a contractor facing job termination with an unreasonable request to complete a complex project before their end date, despite prior promises of full-time employment. They are considering an ultimatum but seek advice on whether this approach is reasonable.**

When faced with unprofessional behavior from an employer, prioritize self-preservation and future opportunities over attempting to salvage the situation through negotiation. Focus on fulfilling basic job requirements without exceeding expectations for a company demonstrating a lack of loyalty or respect. Maintaining professionalism means delivering competent work *within* defined boundaries, not sacrificing personal well-being or career prospects for an ungrateful organization.

*Source: [My boss gave me an end date for my job- but he wants a very complex project done](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/128876) — answer by Old_Lamplighter, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Career Switch

**This person has been fired from three software development jobs within 18 months and is questioning whether they should change careers due to repeated performance issues.**

Repeated job loss isn't necessarily a sign to abandon the field, but rather an indication of misalignment between personal work style and company expectations. Prioritizing communication with management *before* undertaking significant independent tasks (like refactoring) is crucial, as is accepting that most companies operate with existing technical debt. Focusing on self-reflection, rebuilding confidence, and carefully vetting future managers are key steps toward finding a better fit.

*Source: [Fired for third time from a software development job. What to do?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/120957) — answer by Diane M, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Fulltime

**A new software developer finds they consistently struggle to maintain focus and productivity for a full 8-hour workday, despite genuine effort, leading to concern from their manager.**

Expecting constant peak performance is unrealistic; sustainable work requires acknowledging natural energy fluctuations. Prioritizing regular breaks – even short ones – is crucial for maintaining cognitive function and preventing burnout. Addressing potential underlying health factors like diet, vision, or general fatigue through professional consultation can also significantly improve sustained focus.

*Source: [Is it normal to not be able to work 8 hours a day?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/148731) — answer by virolino, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Networking

**The asker feels excluded from networking opportunities because coffee and beer are central to workplace social interactions, but they don't enjoy either beverage.**

Social rituals like offering drinks aren’t necessarily about *consuming* the drink itself; they're about building connection. It's perfectly acceptable to politely decline offered beverages or substitute them with something you prefer without explanation, and focusing on the conversation is what truly matters. Don't feel pressured to participate in a ritual that feels disingenuous – prioritize genuine interaction over conforming to expectations.

*Source: [How can I politely work my way around not liking coffee or beer when it comes to](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/138674) — answer by spikey_richie, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Background Check

**The questioner received a job offer contingent on a background check, but the consent form requested ongoing, unannounced checks throughout their employment and declined to sign it, leading to rescinded offer.**

Protecting personal boundaries is crucial even when seemingly unnecessary; accepting broad consent for future monitoring can set a concerning precedent. While a company may currently have good intentions, policies can change hands or be misused over time. Prioritizing principles and being willing to walk away from an uncomfortable situation demonstrates self-respect and professional integrity.

*Source: [Pre-employment background check with consent for future checks](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/131851) — answer by Martin Bonner supports Monica, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Sexual Harassment

**The questioner noticed their gaze wandering while speaking with a female colleague whose attire was revealing, and is concerned they may have made her uncomfortable. They are unsure whether to apologize or ignore the incident.**

While acknowledging that unwanted attention is never okay, the advice emphasizes that brief, unintentional glances aren't necessarily offensive if coupled with genuine respect for the person’s professional contributions. Focus on demonstrating value and treating colleagues as skilled individuals rather than objects; a respectful demeanor generally outweighs momentary eye contact. An apology isn't necessary unless your behavior actively made her feel devalued or uncomfortable beyond a fleeting glance.

*Source: [Talking to colleague with short skirt - how do I not come off as a creep?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/86261) — answer by Jane S, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Learning

**A web developer is questioning whether it's reasonable for their employer to expect them to learn a new technology entirely on their own time, as suggested by a new team member. They feel the responsibility for training should lie with the company.**

While continuous learning is crucial for developers, expecting employees to master new technologies solely during personal hours isn't standard practice. A healthy transition involves employer support through dedicated training or allowing adjusted timelines for project completion while adapting to the new tools. Proactively communicating this need to management and proposing a collaborative learning plan is a constructive approach.

*Source: [Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wan](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/132802) — answer by Neo, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Employer

**The asker received a job offer with a letter of intent but is being asked to give notice *before* receiving a formal contract, and is also pressured to start work early and provide a reference from their current employer before signing anything.**

This situation signals potential issues with the new employer's practices. It’s crucial to prioritize securing a signed contract *before* making any commitments like resigning from your current role or performing work, as this protects your professional standing. A reputable employer will understand reasonable requests for contractual security and won't pressure candidates into unusual arrangements before formalizing employment.

*Source: [I've been offered a job, but my new employer won't give me a contract until afte](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/89869) — answer by Jimmy Righter, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Qualification

**This person has a math background seeking data science roles but lacks demonstrable coding skills beyond limited coursework and feels unprepared for basic coding assessments like FizzBuzz. They're in lockdown and need low-cost ways to build a portfolio.**

Self-assessment is crucial; failing fundamental tasks indicates a lack of core coding ability, regardless of Google proficiency. The most effective way to prove coding skill isn’t certifications but consistent practice through building projects – even small ones like web apps or data analyses. Focus on accumulating practical experience and demonstrating tangible results rather than seeking quick qualifications.

*Source: [I'm in isolation - How can I prove that I can code without leaving the house or ](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/156575) — answer by Jeffrey, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Education

**The questioner regularly reads programming books during work hours despite not having explicit permission, and feels conflicted about whether this practice is ethical given the potential for it to be seen as misuse of company time.**

Professional development is crucial but requires transparency; openly communicating learning activities with management avoids insubordination and demonstrates commitment to aligning growth with company goals. Prioritizing core job responsibilities and factoring professional development time into project estimates are essential to ensure productivity isn't negatively impacted. Ultimately, ethical behavior hinges on honesty and ensuring that self-improvement efforts demonstrably benefit the current role or future contributions.

*Source: [Is it ethical to read programming books on the clock?](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/12058) — answer by JeffO, CC-BY-SA 4.0*


## Complaint

**The questioner reported illegal activity committed by their boss to *their* boss, who then revealed this report to the offending supervisor, resulting in retaliatory treatment and increased workload. They are hesitant to leave due to a lack of alternative employment.**

Reporting wrongdoing up the chain of command isn't always effective, especially when it bypasses official channels; in cases of illegal activity, direct reporting to relevant authorities is often legally required for personal protection. This situation highlights the importance of understanding whistleblower protections and seeking legal counsel to assess liability and potential recourse against retaliation. Prioritizing self-preservation – including documenting evidence and avoiding premature resignation – should be paramount when facing a hostile work environment following a report.

*Source: [I reported the illegal activity of my boss to his boss. My boss found out. Now I](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/q/131183) — answer by AndreiROM, CC-BY-SA 4.0*
