Market evidence report — tennis-coach

Source: 64 real job ads (JSearch API, countries: us 64), extracted into the MSSQL evidence store; as of 2026-07-20. This report contains extracted, aggregated facts only — no ad text is reproduced (copyright / platform terms).

Seniority distribution

Seniority	Ads	Share
mid	32	50 %
n/a	17	27 %
lead	10	16 %
junior	5	8 %

Tools — full market ranking

#	Item	Ads	Share

Hard skills — full market ranking

#	Item	Ads	Share
1	tennis coaching	25	39 %
2	tennis instruction	20	31 %
3	lesson planning	16	25 %
4	player development	14	22 %
5	individualized coaching	8	12 %
6	practice planning	7	11 %
7	skill development	6	9 %
8	budget management	5	8 %
9	fundraising	5	8 %
10	recruiting	5	8 %
11	program management	4	6 %
12	program planning	4	6 %
13	customer service	3	5 %
14	player evaluation	3	5 %
15	player recruitment	3	5 %
16	student-athlete recruitment	3	5 %

Methods — full market ranking

#	Item	Ads	Share
1	NCAA compliance	6	9 %

Responsibilities — full market ranking

#	Item	Ads	Share
1	private lesson delivery	12	19 %
2	group class delivery	8	12 %
3	schedule communication	8	12 %
4	program delivery	4	6 %
5	coaching	3	5 %
6	court maintenance	3	5 %
7	equipment management	3	5 %
8	fundraising support	3	5 %
9	program promotion	3	5 %
10	skill development	3	5 %

Regional breakdown

Corpus note: 64 relevant ads in total — below the 100-ad target for a fully reliable ranking. Percentages above should be read as indicative.

US (us)

64 ads.

Top hard skills:

tennis coaching — 39 % (25 ads)
tennis instruction — 31 % (20 ads)
lesson planning — 25 % (16 ads)
player development — 22 % (14 ads)
individualized coaching — 12 % (8 ads)
practice planning — 11 % (7 ads)
skill development — 9 % (6 ads)
budget management — 8 % (5 ads)
fundraising — 8 % (5 ads)
recruiting — 8 % (5 ads)

Seniority: mid 50 % · n/a 27 % · lead 16 % · junior 8 %

UK (gb)

Insufficient evidence — 0 ads (minimum for a regional ranking: 30). No ranking is reported for this region.

EU/DACH (de, at, ch, nl)